The difficulties we are seeking solve, including “quantizing gravity” are actually speculative by your requirements
We agree totally that it is a fair stand-to brush such issues regarding as “speculation”. But if you imagine them really worth some time, upcoming sequence idea is a game you can gamble. That has been my personal allege. I know might agree that it is a bit unrealistic to expect a low-speculative option to an issue that you believe already speculative.
So i do enjoy it if you see my personal postings prior to removing with the rants, stringing cliches,
Incidentally, We never ever said a phrase in the supersymmetry and you can Planck measure unification in my post because is particularly a reaction to an effective question on the empirical basis out-of sequence concept. . etc. It absolutely was meant for the experts out of string principle who indeed features medical reasons to hate it, rather than abdomen-responses.
I never mentioned that. Quantizing the law of gravity https://datingranking.net/cs/amateurmatch-recenze/ isn’t speculative of the my personal conditions, it’s difficulty and this can be handled various other indicates instead all of the speculation involved in the sequence design. That is harder to do than saying one to string concept predicts gravity following having fun with lies so you can censor out those individuals implementing possibilities.
‘Incidentally, I never ever told you a word regarding supersymmetry and you can Planck size unification in my own post because it was especially a reaction to a beneficial question towards the empirical foundation out of string idea.’